Join us at RCJRG's next meeting at 7 pm on Wednesday, October 26. We'll have dinner and discuss the past, present, and future of stop and frisk. Bring yourself and bring a friend (but have them RSVP)! This meeting's readings draw from some of the best-written and most interesting academic and popular writing on stop and frisk. Please RSVP here to help us get a precise food order for dinner. We'll be meeting in the Manning Faculty Lounge, which is a set of rooms on the second floor breezeway between Crown and the classroom building. Thank you! Readings: 1. Daniel Bergner, The Atlantic, "Is Stop-and-Frisk Worth It?" 2. Tracey Meares, Univ. of Chicago Law Review, "Programming Errors: Understanding the Constitutionality of Stop-and-Frisk as a Program, Not an Incident."
3. Kami Chavis Simmons, Wake Forest Law Review, "The Legacy of Stop and Frisk: Addressing the Vestiges of a Violent Police Culture."
4. Optional: Eugene Kiely, Factcheck.org, "Is Stop and Frisk Unconstitutional?" 5. Optional: Floyd v. City of New York:
6. Optional: NYPD quarterly data reports on stops and frisks.
|
FACULTY SPONSORDavid Alan Sklansky Archives
March 2017
|